Join/Partner With Us - Full or P/T           Purchase our Testimonial CD and DVD

Cari's new bone density scan shows remarkable improvement in her bone density - From Osteoporosis to Osteopenia (up to 58% improvement!).  Click HERE to see the reports.

Isn't this stuff just placebo?  Show me some scientific studies!

Surprisingly enough, there is a growing amount of scientific research supporting these technologies and we actually have products published in major peer-reviewed medical journals.  In fact, our company has formed an alliance with The University of California, Irvine Medical School, including a center on campus with their corporate name on it. 

Dr. Michael Weintraub, published in many of the studies below sought out to discredit the use of magnets for health and ended up proving to himself that they do indeed work.  His research has uncovered the miracle of properly engineered magnetic products and their dramatic impact on significant health challenges such as Diabetic Neuropathy and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Mr. Curtis Bennett, (http://www.thermoguy.com/) a renowned Termographer thought his Thermal Imaging expertise could prove that using magnets for health had no possible positive benefit and was a waste of money.  He also proved himself wrong with some shockingly clear results!

To see the medical research found in major medical journals relating to these technologies, please see the following links:

First, go to www.pubmed.com (The National Library of Medicine Research Database Search Site) and search for the following numbers separately (or click the links to go directly to each study): 12736891, 12180734, 12501067, 12126173, 15992236 (review of controlled studies) * summary below.

And a few more studies not indexed in PubMed:

1. Weintraub MI, Cole SP. Neuromagnetic treatment of pain in refractory carpal tunnel syndrome: an electrophysiological and placebo analysis. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2000;15(2/3):77-81.

2. Markov MS, Colbert AP.  Magnetic and electromagnetic field therapy. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2000;15:17-29.

. . ."there is an abundance of experimental and clinical data which demonstrates that exogenous electromagnetic fields of surprisingly low amplitudes can have a profound effect on a wide variety of biological systems. The data on in vitro systems suggests that the biological activity of the cell (e.g., division or differentiation) can be modulated by magnetic fields. Perhaps the greatest challenge for what we may term electromagnetic biology and medicine is to establish the proper dosimetry for modulation of the desired biochemical cascade. This may have a far-reaching impact on the cost of health care worldwide."

3. Weintraub MI. Magnetic Bio-Stimulation in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a novel intervention - A randomized double-placebo crossover study.  Am J Pain Management, 9(1) pp 8-17, 1999

" . . . painful dysethesias assiciated with C-fiber dysfunction in the diabetic cohort responded dramatically to exposure to static magnetic fields."

4. Weintraub MI. Chronic submaximal magnetic stimulation in peripheral neuropathy: Is there a beneficial therapeutic relationship, Amer J Pain Management 8 (1998), 12–16.

* Eccles NK.    A Critical review of randomized controlled trials of static magnets for pain relief. J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Jun;11(3):495-509.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to establish whether there is evidence for or against the efficacy of static magnets to produce analgesia. METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken of studies that compared the use of static magnets with an appropriate control for the treatment of pain. Study methods, their quality, and outcome were also reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, 13 of the 21 studies reported a significant analgesic effect due to static magnets. Of the 18 better quality studies with 3 points or more on the quality assessment, 11 were positive and six were negative, and in one there was a non-significant trend towards a positive analgesic effect. In two of the negative studies, there are concerns over adequacy of magnet power for the type of pain, and in the other study of duration of exposure to the magnetic field. If these two studies are excluded on the grounds of inadequate treatment, then 11 out of 15 (73.3%) of the better quality studies demonstrated a positive effect of static magnets in achieving analgesia across a broad range of different types of pain (neuropathic, inflammatory, musculoskeletal, fibromyalgic, rheumatic, and postsurgical). CONCLUSIONS: The weight of evidence from published, well-conducted controlled trials suggests that static magnetic fields are able to induce analgesia.

 

Does anyone actually make money doing this?

Click this link to see some sites of some friends of mine in the business or contact us for more information about these technologies.

Thanks for stopping by,

Loren & Cari Roundy